KAM wrote: > Matthew van Eerde >> I think it would be better to omit the wrapping. action_add_header >> adds a line to a file of milter commands. Embedding newlines in a particular >> command is dangerous. I'm guessing that libmilter will wrap long >> headers for you. > > I've used this text::wrap for ages to build a SpamAssassin-esque rules > header and A) believe it is safe and B) believe it is necessary to be > RFC compliant.
You're right, I'm wrong. There's no danger in embedding the newlines because the content of the header is %dd-encoded in the file. The documentation for smfi_addheader says that "Neither the name nor the value of the header is checked for standards compliance. It is the filter writer's responsibility to ensure that no standards are violated." -- Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902 Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer _______________________________________________ NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it. Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
