Paul Murphy wrote:

>>You may consider cutting back to two slaves to save system 
>>memory.  You certainly don't need 5 slaves with this mail load.

> Ah, but I do, because the mail pattern is such that I tend to get mail in
> bursts on a regular basis, where 4-5 slaves are busy for a couple of minutes.

That's fine; keep MX_MINIMUM low, but have a reasonable MX_MAXIMUM to
accomodate the bursts.

Regards,

David.
_______________________________________________
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID.  You may ignore it.

Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang

Reply via email to