Fernando Gleiser wrote:
Because RTF-mail is evil and disclaimers are evil, so an RTF disclaimer
would be too much evil together so nature has ways to prevent this
from happening :)
Would this be a case where HTML email is less evil, because someone with
a text-only client would at least have half a chance of reading it, or
would HTML still be more evil, because of the potential as an attack
vector given a sufficiently insecure client?
Inquiring minds want to know!
--
Kelson Vibber
SpeedGate Communications <www.speed.net>
_______________________________________________
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it.
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
