On 19 Apr 2006 at 8:47, Adam Lanier wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 08:20 -0400, David F. Skoll wrote:
>
> > So you need to do the checks in filter_sender, and filter_helo is
> > essentially
> > useless.
> >
>
> Beat that dead horse, David!
To be honest, because of the fact that you can't truly reject at the
"HELO" stage, plus the existence of sub-standard SMTP state machines,
plus the fact that variables aren't available, I'm working on moving
everything that was in filter_helo/_sender/_recipient into filter_begin
at the very least (maybe "filter" itself).
At that point, I will have enough info to make really informed
decisions about what to do.
--
Jeff Rife |
| http://www.nabs.net/Cartoons/RhymesWithOrange/CatBed.jpg
_______________________________________________
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it.
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang