On 4/21/06, Paul Whittney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe another possibility is to limit what accounts get images..
>
> I've been thinking about this, in relation to clients wanting their
> email address on their webpages (uurrgghh). If there is a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> or abuse@ postmaster@ webmaster@ (etc...), would it be worth it to
> deny connections, stating a "Please see www.mydomain.com/emailRules.html"
> in the response? As some small places have info and webmaster directed
> to their real email address.
Check the RFCs. I'm pretty sure that at least abuse@ and postmaster@
are required to be accepted. Auto responders etc have resulted in
(that I know of) at least one ISP finding themselves on the wrong end
of a number of RBLs (as the result is to make it almost impossible to
report spam/abuse).
--
Please keep list traffic on the list.
Rob MacGregor
Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he
doesn't become a monster. Friedrich Nietzsche
_______________________________________________
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it.
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
