> I briefly studied that code, and it doesn't really help because this > code can already return "SMFIS_REJECT" at xxfi_body() time. Mimedefang > doesn't allow interactivity with sendmail at that level.
> However, if you then look at the milter_data() routine in milter.c from > the sendmail source, then it becomes obvious that sendmail calls all > "data section" related milter calls for one milter in succession, > so it doesn't really matter whether you return the reject from > xxfi_body() or only at xxfi_eom()... > So: MIMEDefang is good enough (as I already said in my previous > message :) This is helpful info. Thanks. :) Ken _______________________________________________ NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it. Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
