-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Jan-Pieter Cornet wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 01:44:22AM -0700, John Rudd wrote:
But:
1) to reject based on the content of the HELO string is an RFC violation
This is a blatant and oft-repeated lie. Section 4.1.4 in RFC2821 contains
very specific wording. Only an IP mismatch is disallowed as a reason for
rejection. For any other violation, even if it's a local policy violation,
you are allowed to reject the HELO/EHLO argument.
RFC2821 speaks about EHLO, what about HELO?
Bye,
- --
Steffen Kaiser
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iQEVAwUBRREXKOgJIbZtwg6XAQIImQf/dr74LPlgD1/jEPjYY9lflLvMXaCheVYc
RGazuim/KEe8Y60BxgQXCOPBb2jAEY76DR4mZw1pmKQNtcaWt6pjU1RCTWj/ZJjV
Lwn3y+d0uLVx+9DVVE7Y2nbbtS2rodRee0CA3fCRqQ7suJWk0f5CQENC9NLdUbDr
SlT0RmBqsvNitzflcvkZ0V4oOC59X6Yvv3jhicFfDcNlDrj0O/h3nyboRYVZEl/u
bPNj9s3tTautjTLBLrFACmJyDMurzKa/WzpAnI0rmArKaTbh3sXWNe/xMz0Qwt9U
VLhgTDVHvEqn1hAIv4Dg3ANU9lw8nOhwMOlVdFs/g3d1jCI8Qnn8Sw==
=ZkuQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it.
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
