dick hoogendijk wrote:
On 16 Oct Mark Johnson wrote:
1) Run spamc as any user and I get 10.5.
2) Run spamassassin -D as any user and get 10.5
Similiar message from spamassassin:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=10.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,EXTRA_MPART_TYPE,
It seems here spamassassin is even giving a higher score (10.8)
So how come mimedefang comes up with a 2.x?
Not sure... But it must be how mimedefang is calling Spamassassin
because the report part is not the same as what Spamassassin says on the
command line. I also thought I was running into the $SALocalTestsOnly =
0 problem, but that's not the case. I can see in the maillog that there
are plenty of razor, pyzor and uribl scores, so it's not the network
tests. Things like SARE_STOCKS don't look like they get called when run
from mimedefang.
Thanks!
Mark
_______________________________________________
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it.
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
