[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > For 2.58, what do you think about removing the eml not multipart code > from examples/suggested-minimum-filter-for-windows-clients (in filter & > filter_multipart) ?
Sounds good; I agree that it's probably useless. Regards, David. _______________________________________________ NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it. Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
