Cormack, Ken wrote: > [snip] >As you can see, I have turned off the actual rejection, since this caused >LOTS of problems just beginning today! I'm still logging the info, so that >come next week I can see what correlation there might be between the IP >addresses that get logged, and if there's a common SMTP package they all run >(that might have been auto-updated last night), or whatever, that might >reveal why dozens of our regular customers all suddenly today were rejected >for a rule that has been in place for a long time. > >Am I the only one A) doing this type of test, or B) seeing this sudden >problem? I normally see ~200 to ~300 rejections per day from this rule. >Today, the log of my primary server alone contains several thousands of >hits. > >Ken
Try to sample a stream from such an offender with tcpdump or ethereal, and see if you can pull out information about the mail agent being used. I doubt it's bugid 279525 in Thunderbird. -Philip _______________________________________________ NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it. Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
