On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 01:46:17PM +0100, Jonas Eckerman wrote: > >I'll look at some compromise solution. :-) > > Not sure what kind of headers Kevin (and others?) are adding, but it might > be worth it ot check if plugins could be used in more cases.
We're currently adding an extra header to spamassassin in case ClamAV detects a phishing mail. We don't want to reject those phishes as a virus (because they aren't), but we do want to tag them as possibly unwanted. And we don't want to run clamav again as a plugin from within spamassassin, as clamav is just as big a CPU hog as spamassassin itself is (at least, the 0.8x versions are). In the future we might also pass on other information to spamassassin via extra headers. But, given the fact that we just switched to using spamd instead of the builtin Mail::SpamAssassin modules, we don't really need support builtin to mimedefang at the moment either... -- Jan-Pieter Cornet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> !! Disclamer: The addressee of this email is not the intended recipient. !! !! This is only a test of the echelon and data retention systems. Please !! !! archive this message indefinitely to allow verification of the logs. !! _______________________________________________ NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it. Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
