Jan-Pieter Cornet wrote: [...]
> Hmm, David, since when did you change your opinion on rfc-ignorant? :) Since they de-blacklisted roaringpenguin.com :-) For those not in the know: roaringpenguin.com rejects mail from <> to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> We do this because: a) We never *send* mail as "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", so we never expect DSNs or vacation replies to that address, and b) We have a real person reading postmaster's mail. I don't want that person (aka me) to be sent mail that doesn't have a valid return path, because it wastes my time. RFC-Ignorant's owner contended that I was violating RFCs, and I contended I was not. We had a big debate and the result was that he added the third bullet point at http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/policy-postmaster.php Regards, David. _______________________________________________ NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it. Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
