Cormack, Ken wrote: > I've been playing with the new Beta, and you are right... This new tool is > "spiffy"!
Great! Glad you like it! > Can it be expanded [...] Uh-oh... OK. I wrote the tool to diagnose some thorny performance issues at a large customer installation. Unfortunately, messing with watch-multiple-mimdefangs isn't directly revenue-generating. :-( So when I have time, I will add requested features. But it may take a while... > to include the other features currently present in > "watch-mimedefang" (latency, activations, reaps, etc.), the "reread filters" > button, the slider for "update interval", and so on? Does anyone find activations and reaps useful? I don't. And we already include latency. > I especially like the "busy slaves" windows, showing where each thread is at > in its processing of an email, and the ability to "strace" a process by > simply clicking on it. Yeah, I like that too. :-) Regards, David. _______________________________________________ NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it. Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
