> Is 'your' queue better than everyone else's? Why not do a 4xx tmpfail > if your address check temporarily fails? Any real MTA should be > prepared to queue and retry.
Yes, frankly, it is better than the vast majority of mail queue's out there. 1 - Call me a control freak but if I *can* control mail delivery, I will. On a daily basis, I deal with a lot of pinhead email admins and removing unknowns from a model is best. 2 - If we have a customer moving, then we can use mailertables to redirect their email as an in-between hop without ANY downtime due to DNS poisoning 3 - If we have a customer down, we can deliver their email to a mailbox for them to access via webmail. 4 - If we have a customer down, I can immediately trigger a dequeue of their email without waiting on servers to retry delivery in an unknown amount of time that can range into hours or even days. 5 - I care a LOT about FPs. I'd rather get 100 spams than 1 FPs. Email is critical to what I and my customers do and losing email through collateral damage is not acceptable. Regards, KAM _______________________________________________ NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it. Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
