Have you ever hit performance problems caused by access table being to
big to be cached in memory?
[sendmail can do 30+ access lookups per one single SMTP session message]
I haven't had that issue but I would imagine the performance of an access
table is still far better than a milter being involved. I agree with DFS'
comment that sometimes you have to do it with a milter for flexibility,
though.
Regards,
KAM
_______________________________________________
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it.
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
