On 2/3/2010 2:19 PM, - wrote:
--- On Wed, 2/3/10, Tony<[email protected]>  wrote:
...
ok thanks for this info David, I appreciate it and it makes
things clearer. Based on what you say I will leave things as
they are ...

NO!  By leaving it, you're scanning TWICE (or more).  You're not fixing the 
problem.

Now that he has MimeDefang rejecting matches, he's only scanning the non-spam messages twice, though...

--
  Les Mikesell
   [email protected]

_______________________________________________
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID.  You may ignore it.

Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang

Reply via email to