Jason Bertoch wrote: > I like the idea of a sanity check and, to my knowledge, even at 50 > it has never hit before. I'm going to bump it to 100 for now, and > wait for my source to verify the original claim.
The impetus behind this limit was to catch badly-behaved hosts that (1) loop DSNs, adding an extra MIME layer at each iteration, and (2) delete Received: headers so normal mail loop detection fails. Yes, we have seen this in real life. So if you use a limit, I would set it very high (500 or 1000, say). Regards, David. _______________________________________________ NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it. Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
