> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:mimedefang- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Andre Doles > Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 6:04 PM > > Feb 23 00:50:25 mydns1 spamd[3106]: spamd: result: . -78 - > AWL,BAYES_99,DCC_CHECK,DIGEST_MULTIPLE,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16,HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_ > 02,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_SHORT_LINK_IMG_2,MIME_HTML_ONLY,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 > ,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100,RAZOR2_CHECK,RCVD_IN_PBL,RDNS_NONE,URIBL_AB_SURB > L,URIBL_BLACK,URIBL_JP_SURBL,URIBL_SBL,URI_HEX,USER_IN_WHITELIST
All of the previous replies offer good advice, but may be more complicated than you need right away. The biggest thing that stands out to me is that USER_IN_WHITELIST is matching. If you fixed that, the mail would score would have been a whopping 22! Do you have a configuration line that reads "whitelist_from *[email protected]"? In general, you should never use the bare whitelist_from directive. If you must whitelist mail from users in your domain, take the previous advice and configure a SPF record and use whirtelist_from_spf instead. Jason A. Bertoch Network Administrator [email protected] Electronet Broadband Communications 3411 Capital Medical Blvd. Tallahassee, FL 32308 (V) 850.222.0229 (F) 850.222.8771 _______________________________________________ NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it. Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
