>From log entries only - look at the MD-multiplexor lines:

...
Apr  1 11:27:19 (none) sendmail[27159]: STARTTLS=server, 
relay=mail-mta2-prod.shu.edu [149.150.52.166], version=TLSv1/SSLv3, verify=OK, 
cipher=RC4-MD5, bits=128/128
Apr  1 11:27:20 (none) MimeDefang[488]: o31IPnab027159: SPF=pass 
From=<[email protected]> (Mechanism 'ip4:149.150.52.166' matched)
Apr  1 11:27:20 (none) sendmail[27159]: o31IPnab027159: 
from=<[email protected]>, size=4260, class=0, nrcpts=1, 
msgid=<[email protected]>, 
proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=mail-mta2-prod.shu.edu [149.150.52.166]
Apr  1 11:27:20 (none) dkim-filter[490]: o31IPnab027159: no signature data
Apr  1 11:27:21 (none) mimedefang-multiplexor[485]: Slave 0 stderr: plugin: 
eval failed: Can't call method "tie_db_readonly" on an undefined v
alue at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/Bayes.pm 
line 610.
Apr  1 11:27:24 (none) mimedefang-multiplexor[485]: Slave 0 stderr: plugin: 
eval failed: Can't call method "untie_db" on an undefined value at
 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/Bayes.pm line 
373.
Apr  1 11:27:24 (none) mimedefang-multiplexor[485]: Slave 0 stderr: plugin: 
eval failed: Can't call method "db_readable" on an undefined value
 at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/Bayes.pm 
line 300.
Apr  1 11:27:24 (none) mimedefang-multiplexor[485]: Slave 0 stderr: plugin: 
eval failed: Can't call method "db_readable" on an undefined value
 at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/Bayes.pm 
line 300.
Apr  1 11:27:24 (none) MimeDefang[488]: o31IPnab027159: Spam-Score=14.042 
Relay=149.150.52.166 To=<[email protected]> 
Rules=BAD_CREDIT,DEAR_SOMETHING,FILL_THIS_FORM_LOAN,FILL_THIS_FORM_LONG,HTML_MESSAGE,J_CHICKENPOX_45,J_CHICKENPOX_72,MISSING_HEADERS,SPF_PASS,T_FILL_THIS_FORM,T_LOTS_OF_MONEY,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,US_DOLLARS_3
...

In this case, the mail was spammy (and addressed to a spamtrap which should be 
obviously one), so it got delivered to <[email protected]>.  However, "an undefined 
value" is of concern....

This does not appear to be a fatal problem to message scanning/flow, but 
perhaps it keeps the bayesian system from learning?

Has anyone else observed this?
_______________________________________________
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID.  You may ignore it.

Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang

Reply via email to