On 7/9/2010 3:13 PM, - wrote:
Aside:
--- On Fri, 7/9/10, Joseph Brennan<[email protected]> wrote:
You're going to reject a lot of mail. I wouldn't do this
[reject html-only mail] even just for myself.
Why? I've been doing that for years (since 2002). Per a review of my server
logs, only people I don't know send me HTML mail (i.e. spam).
However, I use a custom header rule in sendmail, not MD, to reject such. I also have in
the ruleset the ability to check the sender against my "access" database and
whitelist certain HTML senders if I choose.
90%+ of all HTML in e-mail is unnecessary. Only rarely does it add any value
to the content or its display.
I guess that all depends on what you want to see... I could say that
about 90% of the text I receive too, but I can't afford to ignore it.
--
Les Mikesell
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it.
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
