--- On Fri, 8/20/10, David F. Skoll <[email protected]> wrote:
> [Bounce vs. reject]
>
> IMO, "reject" is the more accurate term. However, here's reality:
> Paying projects take precedence over non-paying ones and important
> bugs take priority over minor bugs, so extremely minor nitpicks like
> this are really low on my priority list.
All I ask is that the next time you have to mess with the software, please
consider changing it. A global replace works for most areas. The exceptions:
CHANGELOG (obviously).
mimedefang.pl.in - Globally, except for the addition of it as an alias to
"action_reject()".
mimedefang-filter.5.in - Globally, except for the addition of a note of it as
an alias (for backward compatibility).
mimedefang-protocol.7.in:198 - Delete the word Bounce, and capitalize reject
(and bring it outside the parentheses).
Everywhere else, it's simply a global change ("bounce => "reject" , and
capitalized equivalents):
README
README.SECURITY
mimedefang.c
contrib/graphdefang-0.9/event/sendmail/sympa_outgoing
examples/suggested-minimum-filter-for-windows-clients
tests/parts/action_bounce.bin
tests/test-filter
tests/test-msg-2
It should take about 10 minutes for these changes at most.
_______________________________________________
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it.
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
