On 11/4/10 8:31 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
Hello,

The reason I do not like (and won't accept) this patch is that it's
an ugly hack.  I would much rather have a patch that passes
*all* Sendmail macros in at filter_connect/_helo/_sender/_recipient time
in a structured way.  That way, the C code and Perl code will not
need updating every time some new piece of information is needed.

I am going to revert the 2.71-BETA-1 patch to stop passing in the
client port number because it's ugly.  I'll then look at a proper
solution to the problem.

Regards,

David.

Did this "proper solution" get coded up?  I'd be interested in trying it out 
before 2.72 gets released.

Thanks.

-Philip

_______________________________________________
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID.  You may ignore it.

Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang

Reply via email to