On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:15:17 -0500 James Ralston <[email protected]> wrote:
> David, do you have any opinion on this? Would you be willing to > accept patches in order to enable mimedefang to be invoked as a milter > multiple times? Or are you in the "just run another instance of > mimedefang" camp? I'm not too enthusiastic about this. I really can't see the use-case for multiple milters. It seems to me it's easier and more flexible to do everything (greylisting, DKIM verification, etc.) in Perl. It gives you one place to write policy. The "next generation" Sendmail (MeTA1) makes it official: It only support one pmilter and says you need a multiplexor on your end to support multiple pmilters. [I'm not sure that MeTA1 will ever see the light of day as production software...] Nevertheless, if the patches are not too intrusive, I'll consider them. Regards, David. _______________________________________________ NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it. Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
