On 11/18/2011 7:27 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
On 11/18/11 9:09 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
The extra checks in MD combined with things like bad file parts, etc.
has really helped stop emerging viruses before traditional scanner
signatures are updated. I would recommend the solution remain as-is.
Yeah, my interest is in seeing the remaining parts of the message and
delivering it anyway, rather than just bouncing it.
Sometimes it's useful to contact the sender and let him/her know they have a
compromised machine.
I had to write a 32K virus per day patch for the quarantine routine and
my server isn't that large. You clearly are too bored ;-)
Regards,
KAM
_______________________________________________
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it.
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
