-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 18.02.2012 07:02, schrieb Jobst Schmalenbach: > You're better of NOT using clamav through mimedefang, I used to do that > to. You find loads of info in the internet why hooking it to sendmail is > better.
Do you have a specific reference? I've tried both alternatives too, and came to the conclusion that calling ClamAV through MIMEDefang is better. T. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk8/vvQACgkQ780oymN0g8NwVgCfanNH9YJrqHHXFN1PZdqmvSFs 2eIAn2ntU0iSrRfRjiYT+8LyunR6HrbW =vMYD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it. Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
