On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Philip Prindeville <[email protected]> wrote: > > Well, that's wrong. Going to IANA, I see: > > http://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers/service-names-port-numbers.xml > > <record> > <name>urd</name> > <protocol>tcp</protocol> > <description>URL Rendesvous Directory for SSM</description> > <number>465</number> > </record> > > 465 has *never* been allocated to SMTP. Period. > > It was hijacked. >
Hijacked is pretty strong wording - it was officially proposed, conditionally accepted, then later dropped: http://www.imc.org/ietf-apps-tls/mail-archive/msg00204.html I guess that's the way committees roll... -- Les Mikesell [email protected] _______________________________________________ NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it. Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
