On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 18:06:21 -0600
Richard Laager <[email protected]> wrote:
> Is there a reason that filter_{relay,helo,sender,recipient} use return
> codes to indicate message handling where filter and
> filter_{begin,multipart,end} use action_{bounce,discard,tempfail}?
Yes. The first group correspond one-to-one to various SMTP events
and commands. The second group do not; they correspond more closely
to the structure of the MIME message.
> Would there be any interest in patches which merge those behaviors? If
> so, which way?
I think you'll find it's not easy to change the behaviors without a major
rewrite of the Perl code. This has been on our TODO list for a long time,
but it never seems to happen...
Regards,
David.
_______________________________________________
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it.
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
