On Don, 2012-05-17 at 16:02 -0700, [email protected] wrote:
> --- On Thu, 5/17/12, Kris Deugau <[email protected]> wrote:
> > ...All that said.... Your system, your policy.
>
> In that case, why have standards at all if the results from
> non-compliant software will be accepted anyway? Rejection of
What misses here is the "be liberal what you accept, ..." sentence. But
nowadays adhering to that implies lots of spam.
> non-standard data (including messages) should give sufficient
> motivation to fix broken software.
The problem is that M$FT has to fix it and the the vast majority of
users can't even belief (or do not want to think) that M$FT has bad
tools/apps/.... (if only that they are too lazy to get used to something
else).
And the pressure gets back ....
> Beliefs like yours are the problem. Policies like mine cause the
> solution.
Perhaps it is more annoying if you add these rules to SpamAssassin and
score spam points for it.
Bernd
--
Bernd Petrovitsch Email : [email protected]
LUGA : http://www.luga.at
_______________________________________________
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it.
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
