Hi!
I can think of different reasons:
- not to rely on sendmail, being able to change MTA
- being more flexible with specific logic in mimedefang
- possibility to log sender and recipient(s), sendmail rejects clients
with pre greeting traffic early in SMTP conversation
Best regards
Franz
On 11.01.2013 21:05, [email protected] wrote:
> Franz wrote on 01/11/2013 02:49:54 PM:
>
>> ok, so let's rephrase the question... ;-)
>>
>> Is there a way to prevent SMTP slamming with mimedefang?
>
> Why reinvent the wheel? Sendmail does it very nicely as docummented w/
> GreetPause. What would be gained by moving it to MimeDefang?
_______________________________________________
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it.
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
