On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 11:33:33 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] wrote:

> 3)  Forwarding services shouldn't be randomly probing the ultimate
> destinations.

I disagree strongly (assuming we remove the noise word "randomly")

Attempting to deliver to nonexistent recipients is by far the most
common cause of backscatter, and doing an SMTP call-forward on the
ultimate destination is a simple and cheap way to avoid this.

Your point about post-DATA rejection is valid, but this makes up a very
small percentage of backscatter.

-- David.
_______________________________________________
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID.  You may ignore it.

Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang

Reply via email to