On 08/04/2015 02:11 PM, Dianne Skoll wrote:
On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 14:45:42 -0400
"Kevin A. McGrail" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 8/4/2015 2:02 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Is there any other way to figure out if this is HELO that follows a
STARTTLS?
Save state and re-call the helo check again in filter_sender, perhaps?
This is why I resisted even adding a filter_helo callback. It's
basically useless. Anything you can do in filter_helo might as well
be deferred to filter_sender.
If an SMTP client connects, says EHLO and then closes the connection...
do we really care?
Regards,
Dianne.
What about adding ${tls_version} to the list of parameters to filter_helo?
I'm wondering if maybe passing a reference to a hash of parameters to
the filter_xxx() functions might have been better? Then new parameters
could be added easily without breaking backwards compatibility.
-Philip
_______________________________________________
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it.
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
