Cool thanks! Is there some benefits or other reasons you chose not to use the java logger though?
--- Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Samuel Doyle a écrit : > > >Just curious why you guys ruled out using this > logger > >for Mina? I have some legacy code that uses the > Java > >logger so now I have a mix of two :( > > > > > > > That should not be a problem at all. > > If you are using j.u.l.Logger, you will be able to > use it with MINA > without any modification. The very same with log4j. > We are using slf4j > which is a facade for those kind of API > (http://www.slf4j.org/). > > Emmanuel Lécharny >
