... or how close the client is to the server from a technological point of view. I'm actually connecting .NET-Clients to a Java-Server, and no, I'm not using SOAP+HTTP. MINA works like a charm here, you can even switch ByteBuffer-Writes
to Little-Endian-Mode which can then easily be read in C#.

So definitively worth a look at when you want to connect X to a Java-Server using sockets with X = every thinkable
TCP-Client.

Mike

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MINA and "Java EE" are not really comparable. MINA is a relatively low
level networking library whereas "Java EE" is a collection of higher level
APIs for doing a variety of things including web applications, persistence
and RPC. Some of those may involve HTTP but not all of them - for example
HTTP is irrelevant for EJB persistence.

What does your application do?

If you would consider writing your application using sockets then MINA
definitely is worth looking at. If you would consider writing your
application using RMI or CORBA then "Java EE" may be a more appropriate
choice. It depends on how close to the wire you need to get.

Robert


"David Fire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [email protected] ail.com> cc: Subject: Re: TCP server 09/03/2006 19:57 Please respond to mina-dev



Thanks.
Is my observation about Java EE correct, in that it is HTTP-oreiented?


From: peter royal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: TCP server
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 14:05:12 -0500

On Mar 9, 2006, at 1:54 PM, David Fire wrote:
I'm new to MINA, and hence the newbie question.
I need to develop a server that serves (mobile) clients via a TCP
connection. Clients may maintain a connection open for various  periods
of
time (depending mainly on network coverage).
Is MINA the right framework for me? Is there anything in Java EE  that
can
also do this (I'm just taking my first steps with that  also), or is it
solely HTTP-oriented?
You could certainly do that with MINA.. in fact mina would be ideal  if
you
have lots of longer-lived connections, since it would be able  to scale
nicely.
-pete

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://fotap.org/~osi




<< smime.p7s >>







This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended
as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial
instrument or as an official confirmation of any transaction. All market prices,
data and other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy and
are subject to change without notice. Any comments or statements made herein do not necessarily reflect those of JPMorgan Chase & Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates.


Reply via email to