On 3/27/06, peter royal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mar 26, 2006, at 12:44 PM, Michael Link wrote: > > I also think that most Encoders/Decoders will be thread-safe so > > that it should be possible to remove the synchronized-Blocks at the > > calling places. Perhaps it would be helpful to have something > > similar like the Collections.synchronizedXXX(...) methods for > > Encoders/Decoders. > > I'm in favor of removing the synchronization, and I think a helper > like this would also be a good addition..
Done. I added SynchronizedProtocolEncoder and SynchronizedProtocolDecoder which are more dependency-injection friendly than static decorator methods. Trustin -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP key fingerprints: * E167 E6AF E73A CBCE EE41 4A29 544D DE48 FE95 4E7E * B693 628E 6047 4F8F CFA4 455E 1C62 A7DC 0255 ECA6
