Hi Niklas,
I was looking at your tunneling proxy example.
In AbstractProxyIoHandler.messageReceived() method, is there any
problem if we do this
--------------------------------------
ByteBuffer rb = ( ByteBuffer ) message;
rb.acquire();
( ( IoSession ) session.getAttachment() ).write( rb );
SessionLog.info( session, rb.getString( CHARSET.newDecoder() ) );
--------------------------------------
instead of
--------------------------------------
ByteBuffer rb = ( ByteBuffer ) message;
ByteBuffer wb = ByteBuffer.allocate( rb.remaining() );
rb.mark();
wb.put( rb );
wb.flip();
( ( IoSession ) session.getAttachment() ).write( wb );
rb.reset();
SessionLog.info( session, rb.getString( CHARSET.newDecoder() ) );
--------------------------------------
Basically, is there a problem doing an acquire() instead of making a
copy of the byte buffer when I want to use the byte buffer for writes.
thanks,
Srikanth
On 4/11/06, Niklas Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Vinod Panicker wrote:
> > On 4/11/06, Cameron Taggart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ...
> >
> >>I am just trying to create a proxy to act as a middleman between the
> >>SlimServer 6.2.1 (http://www.slimdevices.com/su_downloads.html)
> >>software written primarily in Perl, and my Squeezebox. It is one step
> >>closer than viewing all the communication with Ethereal.
> >
> >
> > So basically what you want to do is tunnel everything?
>
> I just checked in an example of a tunneling proxy. Have a look at it if
> you want to. There are some tricks in there to make things work (I'm
> thinking about the setTrafficMask() stuff). I'll be happy to explain why
> those things are necessary. Just let me know.
>
> /Niklas
>
