Hi, Thanks for the response. This is eye-opening info... Have you ever tried IBM's aio4j?
Anyways... I hope sun manages to get the performance atleast up to jrockit standards when Mustang goes final. Regards, Vinod. On 4/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Yes, we have been using Mustang betas for quite some time with our > application. > > Our results show that, on our HP DL 585 hardware (4 dual core opterons) BEA > JRockit is still faster in terms of throughput than the Sun JVM. Most > interestingly, the BEA JVM is significantly faster when Gb ethernet is > connecting the clients and servers. We are running RHEL 4. > > I am working with Sun at the moment to analyse our performance results to see > if we can figure out why we see such a difference between the JVMs > particularly when using Gb ethernet. > > Our benchmarks involve sending payloads of around 400 bytes from clients to > server. We have tested with up to 150 clients running concurrently. > > Robert > > > > > "Vinod Panicker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > 18/04/2006 11:32 > Please respond to mina-dev > To: [email protected] > cc: > Subject: MINA with Mustang > > > > Hi, > > Has anyone given MINA a try with the new JDK 1.6 beta? > > It's got the epoll based selector implementation and should be much > more efficient in managing more number of concurrent connections. CPU > usage with idle connections should ideally drop drastically. > > If anyone's got the time and hardware, some benchmarks would be really > welcome :) > > Regards, > Vinod.
