Hi all, Alex forwarded me an interesting message. Tomcat provides a JNI connector which is based on APR (Apache Portable Runtime) for better performance. Jim says it shows better performance than NIO. I didn't look into the code closely yet. Here's the viewcvs page:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/ Will tcnative be a viable option for us? Trustin ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Apr 29, 2006 5:19 AM Subject: FYI [Fwd: Re: RC1 on OS X 10.4] To: Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Karasulu) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 15:51:54 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: RC1 on OS X 10.4 Alex Karasulu wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote: > Alex Karasulu wrote: > >> Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >>> Have you looked at the tcnative-APR/JNI stuff for Tomcat? Using >>> NIO we ran into some issues and when using APR endpoints, we >>> get very cool performance :) >>> >>> >> No I had no clue. >> >> This might be a really nice candidate for another MINA >> connector/acceptor pair implementation. This is something we should >> discuss with Trustin. >> >> > > In addition to being quite a bit faster than NIO, you also get > OpenSSL thrown in for free, more speed there :) > > Mind if I forward this to Trustin and perhaps he can take it to the MINA list so the options can be explored further?
Nope, not at all! -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP key fingerprints: * E167 E6AF E73A CBCE EE41 4A29 544D DE48 FE95 4E7E * B693 628E 6047 4F8F CFA4 455E 1C62 A7DC 0255 ECA6
