[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-160?page=comments#action_12415286 ]
Julien Vermillard commented on DIRMINA-160: ------------------------------------------- I started looking at your code, here some random comments : you're right the API look like much better than the horrible State pattern ;) with the zillion of class you need to define. The class proxy for controlling method transition is a good idea, it make it quite transparent for the developper. I always hate to be forced to use reflexion and classloaders but I can't think about a smarter way. It's looking like a good help for implementing protocols, but is it really MINA specific ? > Add support for defining higher level state machines on top of MINA > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DIRMINA-160 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-160 > Project: Directory MINA > Type: New Feature > Reporter: Niklas Therning > Priority: Minor > > We'll have to provide some kind of FSM support. This should give users a set > of best practices for building complex protocols on top of MINA. > Trustin had the suggestion that we could implement it very simply by > implementing IoHandler which demultiplexes events to an appropriate IoHandler > implementation according to a certain session attribute value. > I guess we could provide some means for defining the states and transitions > too. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
