-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 peter royal wrote: > On Jul 3, 2006, at 11:17 AM, Irving, Dave wrote: >>> So, my proposal is, how about we start creating module(s) in >>> MINA for protocols? >>> >> >> Of course, Im biased - but It would be a shame if we re-wrote http >> support on top of Mina over again, when we have asyncweb already :o) >> We were originally going to make asyncweb a subproject of mina, but at >> the time it was decided it would be cleaner to keep it as a separate >> project. > > Right, it certainly would be a shame. > > Interested in bringing AsyncWeb over here? :)
Oh yeah that was the idea. We just did not start it at the ASF because Dave was not a committer at Apache. I'm all for bringing it over. I think Dave is as well. > > I think that if it lived w/MINA, it might get more help staying > up-to-date with our API changes. > > Certainly no need to re-invent HTTP-on-MINA! +1 Alex -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEqVRFPVto+tI7JJARAje0AJ9jQqWzavm8WbcmIEvJdfS40gUb3QCgy36X IKjXVxZ2kroW7GaN0lleBc8= =iSrv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
