Hi all, Here's my comment on the proposal:
I've never thought that MINA is supposed just a set of libraries. It includes the whole tooling including management, protocol design (+ document generation like ERD tools and IDE integration) and any possible platform it can provide. Library or framework is just a small part of MINA's mission, as you saw it from my ApacheCon US 2005 slides. So we need to update our proposal first. I'll give you more update after more thinking. :) Thank you very much for understanding and waiting for me! HTH, Trustin On 7/17/06, peter royal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 16, 2006, at 3:27 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: > peter royal wrote: >> Howdy all, >> The time has come for MINA to move out from under the (pleasant) >> shadow of Apache DS and become a full project of its own. >> I'd like to get this proposal in front of the Apache board for the >> July meeting, which will be later this week. > > Yeah me too, but shouldn't we wait a little bit longer for Trustin > to get back with his medical problems? > > Perhaps someone can skype with him when he gets online to talk to > him. rather than pushing him to read (strain his eyes) on stuff. > I'm ok with waiting until the August meeting to keep Trustin in the > loop. > > Conversations are hot and now is a good time though but people > should understand. WDYT? I've been waffling over what to do wrt Trustin's situation.. Mainly because I'd like to get AsyncWeb in sooner rather than later. But, I support deferral until August to allow for Trustin's recovery. -pete -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://fotap.org/~osi
-- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP key fingerprints: * E167 E6AF E73A CBCE EE41 4A29 544D DE48 FE95 4E7E * B693 628E 6047 4F8F CFA4 455E 1C62 A7DC 0255 ECA6
