[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-233?page=comments#action_12424773 ] Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-233: -------------------------------------------
SLF4J is just a facade, and it's totally transparent for the user. If someone want to use log4j, then you just add the slf4j-log4j12.jar within mina jar, and it's ok. If it's going to be CL, you add slf4j-jcl.jar... I don't think we need another layer or another logger. If users have some problem with SLF4J, I think the best is to add a documentation about how to use it, or a link to http://www.slf4j.org/manual.html wdyt ? > Provide an extra thin logging layer for those who don't want SLF4J > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: DIRMINA-233 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-233 > Project: Directory MINA > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Trustin Lee > > As MINA gets more and more popular, the number of people who doesn't want > SLF4J increased because they were using other logging frameworks such as > Log4J or commons-logging. We know SLF4J provides what exactly Log4J or > commons-logging provides, but it's just a matter of preference. We need to > meet as many people's preference as we can as a general network application > framework. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
