It seems like Emmanuel's response message is not sent to mina-dev. I'm
forwarding it.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Oct 7, 2006 10:28 AM
Subject: Re: Is it JDK 1.5 time yet?
To: Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Trustin Lee a écrit :
On 10/7/06, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
John E. Conlon a écrit :
>Now that the trunk has moved to 1.1.0 do we still plan to move to JDK
>1.5 (and remove the backport-util-concurrent dep)?
>
>regards,
>
>John
>
>
Well, not yet...
1.1.0 will still have to keep a jdk 1.4 compatibility, while 2.0 will be
full java 5.
My and Peter's idea is to move to Java 5 in 1.1.0, which is a unstable
branch and to make 1.2 the first stable branch with full Java 5
support. Of
course, 1.0.x will be maintained until 1.2 is released. We can call
1.2 as
'2.0', but it's just a number.
Sorry, I have made a confusion with ADS 1.1. I forgot that MINA version
is now 1.0.
Forget what I have wrote, it is irrelevant.
Emmanuel
--
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
--
PGP key fingerprints:
* E167 E6AF E73A CBCE EE41 4A29 544D DE48 FE95 4E7E
* B693 628E 6047 4F8F CFA4 455E 1C62 A7DC 0255 ECA6
