Trustin Lee wrote:
On 10/25/06, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also let me add that there will be more version collisions between MINA
dependencies and the same dependencies used in apps that use MINA but
perhaps of a different version. When you have one jar this problem is
worse than with separate jars.
The problem Vinod mentioned is very different from what you're talking
about
here.
That's why there is an "Also" in my 2nd paragraph. I agreed with Vinod
and added to it to describe other problems.
As I already told Vinod, we can use 'provided' scope dependencies.
It's not a matter of scope. It's a matter of having additional stuff in
the jar that you don't want. Besides the bloat it could create
dependency issues.
Basically we've spent time and effort ironing out the way this multi
project is setup. It just works. I don't see a reason to change it.
I'm going to have to veto this change at this point. I'm not convinced
you have a good reason to do it and there are disadvantages.
Alex
