As Molly said "A very bold move, Slip, to introduce this video to a
group based on rational discussion".
But then again "PS  Thanks Slip, for this reference".
It's just fodder for discussion.
Thanks for your contribution!

On Jan 16, 9:34 pm, "Chris Jenkins" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Sorry Slip. Didn't mean to be dismissive, but when the intro sets the pace
> for great leaps of fallacious logic, I pretty much know what to expect of
> what's coming next. And it's clear from my postings here that I fall into a
> very materialist, rationalist mind set. I don't discount the wonders of
> imagination...I simply don't base my science on it.
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I knew the background string repetition would be annoying to say the
> > least, I found it hard to bear.  Overall I'm happy with the responses
> > but was hoping some could get over the A.D.D. and see what other
> > content offerings were being presented.  I had a feeling that much of
> > it was loose purporting without substantiation, as some of you had
> > pointed out.  Molly seemed on target with "The author's final attempt
> > to quell the argument that everyone must come to this leap in
> > consciousness for the world to move into a collective higher resonance
> > is not clear."  In fact it seemed that the author really didn't know
> > what to do and it all get's frayed at the end.  I do understand where
> > Archy's coming from with "As researchers, we are supposed to listen to
> > everything, yet this is not realistic - bull gets in the way of what
> > clarity and direction we can glimpse, yet our bull-detectors can also
> > get in the way".  Exactly, the bull detection sets a barricade in the
> > road of further exploration.  One minute of a 20 minute video is only
> > 5% and as I said I do understand to a degree.  The first impression
> > for some most likely is, if you've seen one you've seen them all, as
> > Chris point out with "I've been inundated with enough "The Secret"
> > type pseudo physicists lately that I'm utterly put off on the whole
> > thing".  The point most importantly, though, is that this was not
> > about you but more so that I needed clarification on this video which
> > I thought I could get from my esteemed friends, of whom I highly
> > regard as a valuable resource beyond my own personal capacity, so it
> > was really for me.  Not to say that I am less than satisfied but
> > waiting to be satiated as of yet.
> > The reference to quantum physics and Rutherford were vague at best and
> > tugged at my cerebral gray matter for understanding or lack of, which
> > leaves me in a quandary with Chris's first paragraph as well.  I'm
> > hoping that Pat, Gruff, Ian, KC, and everyone else will pop their
> > heads into the window for a look see.  I guess I'm a bit taken with
> > curiosity as to how different personalities view this video, and I
> > guess you all have seen Zeitgeist?, another intriguing video worth
> > your opinion.
> > I agree with Fran that the film contains some interesting, nice ideas
> > and his more in depth analysis reflects my first impression, as it
> > lacked continuity as a whole and I felt it was a bit sporadic.
> > Regardless of the fallacies within the video, I believe that if it can
> > get people to drop the fear and pick up the love we all have something
> > to gain from it.  Remember the majority of people in the world really
> > don't know anything about quantum physics and scientificThe general
> > idea of the video and what it is trying to present doesn't seem
> > negative and I would think that is the attraction for many people
> > unaware of content validity.
>
> > OK so all in all I'll give a 50/50 split on responses. However let's
> > not forget Molly's most inciting comment.............
>
> > "OK MindsEye, let 'er rip"
>
> > Well?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to