MEA CULPA!!! MEA CULPA!!! MEA CULPA!!!
:-)
On Jan 16, 8:15 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
> No need for apology everyone!!
>
> It's all good!
>
> On Jan 16, 10:13 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > As Molly said "A very bold move, Slip, to introduce this video to a
> > group based on rational discussion".
> > But then again "PS Thanks Slip, for this reference".
> > It's just fodder for discussion.
> > Thanks for your contribution!
>
> > On Jan 16, 9:34 pm, "Chris Jenkins" <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > Sorry Slip. Didn't mean to be dismissive, but when the intro sets the pace
> > > for great leaps of fallacious logic, I pretty much know what to expect of
> > > what's coming next. And it's clear from my postings here that I fall into
> > > a
> > > very materialist, rationalist mind set. I don't discount the wonders of
> > > imagination...I simply don't base my science on it.
>
> > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > I knew the background string repetition would be annoying to say the
> > > > least, I found it hard to bear. Overall I'm happy with the responses
> > > > but was hoping some could get over the A.D.D. and see what other
> > > > content offerings were being presented. I had a feeling that much of
> > > > it was loose purporting without substantiation, as some of you had
> > > > pointed out. Molly seemed on target with "The author's final attempt
> > > > to quell the argument that everyone must come to this leap in
> > > > consciousness for the world to move into a collective higher resonance
> > > > is not clear." In fact it seemed that the author really didn't know
> > > > what to do and it all get's frayed at the end. I do understand where
> > > > Archy's coming from with "As researchers, we are supposed to listen to
> > > > everything, yet this is not realistic - bull gets in the way of what
> > > > clarity and direction we can glimpse, yet our bull-detectors can also
> > > > get in the way". Exactly, the bull detection sets a barricade in the
> > > > road of further exploration. One minute of a 20 minute video is only
> > > > 5% and as I said I do understand to a degree. The first impression
> > > > for some most likely is, if you've seen one you've seen them all, as
> > > > Chris point out with "I've been inundated with enough "The Secret"
> > > > type pseudo physicists lately that I'm utterly put off on the whole
> > > > thing". The point most importantly, though, is that this was not
> > > > about you but more so that I needed clarification on this video which
> > > > I thought I could get from my esteemed friends, of whom I highly
> > > > regard as a valuable resource beyond my own personal capacity, so it
> > > > was really for me. Not to say that I am less than satisfied but
> > > > waiting to be satiated as of yet.
> > > > The reference to quantum physics and Rutherford were vague at best and
> > > > tugged at my cerebral gray matter for understanding or lack of, which
> > > > leaves me in a quandary with Chris's first paragraph as well. I'm
> > > > hoping that Pat, Gruff, Ian, KC, and everyone else will pop their
> > > > heads into the window for a look see. I guess I'm a bit taken with
> > > > curiosity as to how different personalities view this video, and I
> > > > guess you all have seen Zeitgeist?, another intriguing video worth
> > > > your opinion.
> > > > I agree with Fran that the film contains some interesting, nice ideas
> > > > and his more in depth analysis reflects my first impression, as it
> > > > lacked continuity as a whole and I felt it was a bit sporadic.
> > > > Regardless of the fallacies within the video, I believe that if it can
> > > > get people to drop the fear and pick up the love we all have something
> > > > to gain from it. Remember the majority of people in the world really
> > > > don't know anything about quantum physics and scientificThe general
> > > > idea of the video and what it is trying to present doesn't seem
> > > > negative and I would think that is the attraction for many people
> > > > unaware of content validity.
>
> > > > OK so all in all I'll give a 50/50 split on responses. However let's
> > > > not forget Molly's most inciting comment.............
>
> > > > "OK MindsEye, let 'er rip"
>
> > > > Well?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
