And furthermore!!  I called my attorney the other day and asked "Can
you answer Two Questions for $200 and he replied "Sure! What's the
Second Question?

On Jan 21, 9:37 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
> Furthermore I went to look at some property to the west and discovered
> that the stipulations to ownership consisted of...........
> No water well drilling............................I guess I have to
> pay someone for the water
> No livestock including chickens, rabbits, pigs, goats
> etc. ................so I guess I have to pay someone else to eat.
> Limitation to one out building.......................you got the
> picture.
>
> So I guess to all of that you will tell me that someone (not me of
> course) is rising to their full potential.
>
> I guarantee that when you are in your 60's you will see it for what it
> is KC.  Of course many of us won't be around for you to share your
> awakening with but perhaps you can share it with the future progeny of
> your generation.
>
> Only so many Yachts can fit in the ocean my friend.
>
> On Jan 21, 9:22 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I never intimated that attorneys were all sneaky. However, a good
> > attorney knows the law but a great attorney knows the judge! lol
>
> > Now we were in a position to get ahead.  Each could rise as high as
> > his potential allowed. <KC
>
> > Position to get ahead?  As in, I can climb up high on the accumulation
> > of dead skulls below me to rise out of the pit and not become another
> > skull?  Potential based on others falling?  Potential that results in
> > the displacement of others?
>
> > Why am I talking about food now? I posted your paragraph (to chris)
> > with starts out with >>I think the flaw in your reasoning is that you
> > assume if something exists everyone is entitled to it. << KC really
> > think about what you are saying.  Do you really think that if
> > something exists, naturally on this planet, that people are Not
> > entitled to it?  Man created television not the sun. I am not entitled
> > to television but I am entitled to the sun. I am entitled to food and
> > water and no one has the right to deprive that entitlement in exchange
> > for slavery.
> > The existence of heart transplants is not different from the existence
> > of plasma TV's, which neither should fall under the category of
> > entitlement.  Go back a million years KC, food existed, why? So that
> > people could gather it all up and "Capitalize" in it's "Existence"?  I
> > don't think so.
> > The initial debate is about capitalism and so because you tangent the
> > debate with exclusivity does not in any way divert the base debate.
>
> > On Jan 21, 8:19 pm, Kierkecraig <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > On Jan 21, 6:54 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > I see you are going to make a good attorney, hope you pass the bar.
> > > > Personally I never could pass a bar without stopping in for at least
> > > > one drink. lol
>
> > > Ok, ok, enough with lawyer jokes.  Fact I've been participating on
> > > this group long before I ever went to law school.  I'm not some sneeky
> > > attorney coming on to make unfair arguments.  I'm quite sincere. . . .
> > > for the record.
>
> > > > But seriously using the heart transplant surgical procedure as
> > > > analogous to resource entitlement is a bit of a legalese stretch.
> > > > Eating food is not an organ transplant. Everyone born "IS" entitled to
> > > > eat.  Food is not a man made commodity but a given planetary resource,
> > > > the sun shines because it exists naturally within our solar system and
> > > > therefore we are entitled to sit out in it.  
>
> > > Why are you talking about food now?  My argument never mentioned food
> > > once.  I've been talking exclusively about medical care and
> > > education.  Food is a whole 'nother topic all together.  One that I
> > > could respond to, but seems would sidetrack the initial debate.
>
> > > > FACT: If capitalists
> > > > could harness the sun and charge people for it they would, regardless
> > > > of the diseases that would occur from the lack of affordability.  They
> > > > would also charge for the air we breath and the rain that falls.
>
> > > Really?  That's a fact?  Who are these "capitalists" of which you
> > > speak?  Yes, people want to make a buck.  Some bad people want to make
> > > a buck unfairly.  Does that mean we lump all of those people who want
> > > to make a buck into one lump group?  That seems unfair, and
> > > uncharitable.  In fact, the principles of free market capitalism do
> > > not suggest such an endeavor.
>
> > > > Fortunately they have not been able to sell sunshine and rain but
> > > > unfortunately they have been able to sell food.  Aside from that much
> > > > of the food they sell has now become GMF's which are increasingly
> > > > turning up with the exclusion of seeds that allow people to grow their
> > > > own crops.  I've noticed that many vegetables not only lack taste but
> > > > are comprised of 95% pulp which makes for more weight which makes for
> > > > more "profit".  I feel very fortunate to have a supplier that
> > > > propagates "heirloom" vegetable plants, and I can tell you that when I
> > > > bite into one of my tomatoes it's like going back in time.  Let's not
> > > > forget mad cow which is the result of cow cannibalism thanks to the
> > > > infinite wisdom of the capitalist cattle rancher.
> > > > OK back on track. I think the idea is to merely socialize those basic
> > > > needs that without which lead to needless suffering.  
>
> > > Needless suffering is what made us turn to free market capitalism to
> > > begin with.  We realized that the rich monarchs and aristocrats were
> > > never going to just give us a piece of the pie.  Revolution after
> > > revolution, we finally broke away from those bastards and got what we
> > > wanted all along, there feet off our necks.  Now we were in a position
> > > to get ahead.  Each could rise as high as his potential allowed.
> > > Capitalism does just that.  Of course it doesn't do so perfectly, but
> > > no system is perfect.
>
> > > > I don't see why
> > > > people have such a problem with it.  Some say that society will no
> > > > longer be motivated but in reality people are forced into motivation.
> > > > Suppose I don't want to have anything in life aside from my basic need
> > > > for food and shelter?  Is this the MO of the Hobo community?  Isn't it
> > > > OK that I don't want to be a cog in the wheel of corporate society?
> > > > The "bottom line" is that the wealthy survive because people need to
> > > > eat but more so because people have to "buy" the food they eat and
> > > > "buy" the shelter in which they live.
>
> > > And what would we have to do in a state of nature?  You would have to
> > > work your ass off 100 hours a week just to live on the edge of
> > > subsistence, and with a life expectancy of 20 years.  Thats life my
> > > friend.  Free market capitalism has made it possible for us all to
> > > live upwards of 80 years, and to do so without having to work 100
> > > hours each week.  Most people don't work over 40 hours a week.
>
> > > > I'm still staggering at the thought that the government wants me to
> > > > pay to bail out the bank that charges me interest on a credit card.
>
> > > I know, makes me sick too.  Bastard socialists!
>
> > > > So now I have to pay the bank so they can lend me my own money that I
> > > > have to pay back with interest.  I just don't get it.  Capitalism or a
> > > > Corrupt Corporate Run Government?  Who is in charge here?  Really!
>
> > > I'm with you!  Trust me!  I'm saying the same thing.  The gov't is
> > > ruining free market capitalism.
>
> > > > I know I'm just a schlep in the world and don't really ask for much
> > > > other than what I can provide for myself and mine but my compassion
> > > > goes out to the world as a whole.  If there is anything in the world
> > > > that should be outlawed it is "people capitalizing on other peoples
> > > > needs".
> > > > Have you ever noticed how the lion trainer gets the lion to do tricks
> > > > by giving him little food treats?
> > > > Is it any different with people?
> > > > Is it too much to ask to have something to eat? (while the rich dine
> > > > on caviar and such)
> > > > I don't care that the rich are rich, that is their curse but I do care
> > > > that the poor are poor.
> > > > No one in suffering has ever crossed my path that I did not lend a
> > > > hand to help!
> > > > That is because I am not a capitalist.
>
> > > So capitalists are by nature uncharitable?  Again, I think such an
> > > accusation is uncharitable.
>
> > > > On Jan 21, 6:45 pm, Kierkecraig <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > So Chris, your saying the problem with the world isn't too much
> > > > > government but too little government?  I'd have to disagree with you
> > > > > there.
>
> > > > > I think the flaw in your reasoning is that you assume if something
> > > > > exists everyone is entitled to it.  Brain, heart, and lung transplants
> > > > > may either be possible, or in the future possible, but they are modern
> > > > > marvels.  No one is entitled to these things.  The procedures take a
> > > > > lot of money, time, and expenses to research and implement.  People
> > > > > put their heart and soul into such ventures because they believe that
> > > > > it will mean a big pay check in their futures.  Not everyone is going
> > > > > to be able to afford a heart transplant.  The most obvious reason is
> > > > > not everyone can afford one.  Not to mention their aren't enough spare
> > > > > hearts lying around.
>
> > > > > The countries who have tried to implement socialism have ended up with
> > > > > countries that cannot keep up with those who have not.  The only
> > > > > reason that medicine had continued to advance in today's modern
> > > > > society is because America is still relatively capitalistic.  We will
> > > > > pay the big bucks for the research and procedures and so people still
> > > > > keep working to make it happen.  But if we adopt medical care like
> > > > > Canada's and England's, I think you can kiss credible medical research
> > > > > goodbye.
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to