Heh yeah well as long as he keeps it in the family and marries a Douglas pine!
On 23 Jan, 17:03, Pat <[email protected]> wrote: > On 23 Jan, 16:13, Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Heh I still feel proud, I'm niether vegist, nor do I worry about his > > sexual preferance, I'm just happy that he seems to be in loving > > relationship! > > I guess, if it's a pine tree, they might easily tie the knot. ;-) > > > > > On 23 Jan, 15:49, Pat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 23 Jan, 14:50, Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Ohh what a pity, I well remeber both the occason and the pride I felt > > > > when I witnessed my oldest boy hug his first tree! > > > > LOL!! Now, as he shags them regularly, how do you feel? (just > > > joking!!!) > > > > > On 23 Jan, 12:22, Pat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > On 23 Jan, 11:39, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Some of my best friends are animals Lee! Especially when well duped > > > > > > on a Friday night. > > > > > > I'd have thought ALL of your friends, best or not, are animals. > > > > > Although I have spoken to a few plants in my time, I never struck up a > > > > > friendship. I suppose, not wanting to be seen to be 'vegist', that it > > > > > wasn't that the plant was unfriendly, but that I, obviously, wasn't > > > > > able to properly sense all the plant hormones that they use to > > > > > communicate. ;-) > > > > > > > On 23 Jan, 11:06, Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Heh I'm not dupeist! Some of my best freinds are dupes! Now why > > > > > > > does > > > > > > > that sound familier? > > > > > > > > On 21 Jan, 12:53, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Not at all! In fact, some of my my best friends are dupes... ;-) > > > > > > > > > [ Attached Message ]From:Kierkecraig > > > > > > > > <[email protected]>To:"\"Minds Eye\"" > > > > > > > > <[email protected]>Date:Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:05:08 > > > > > > > > -0800 (PST)Local:Wed 21 Jan 2009 02:05Subject:[Mind's Eye] Re: > > > > > > > > proof of god > > > > > > > > > Even if theists are dupes, does that preclude atheists from > > > > > > > > being > > > > > > > > dupes? > > > > > > > > > On Jan 20, 1:43 pm, "Chris Jenkins" <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > By measuring the selfish as individuals, and by measuring the > > > > > > > > > relative > > > > > > > > > selfish as "Quality of Life" as members of a society. > > > > > > > > > This is why you are a Law guy and not a sociologist. ;) > > > > > > > > > > However, that's entirely a different question from whether or > > > > > > > > > not theists > > > > > > > > > are dupes. That's a question for the philosophers. > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Kierkecraig > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 20, 12:41 am, manfraco FranktheElder > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Neil > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, you can say that it is a matter of morality; but it > > > > > > > > > > > is also of > > > > > > > > > > > guidance, because religion guides most of the unfortunate > > > > > > > > > > > people who > > > > > > > > > > > have not been educated and some of them are not able to > > > > > > > > > > > think clearly > > > > > > > > > > > for themselves, so religion gives them some ideas how to > > > > > > > > > > > live. > > > > > > > > > > > And exactly what standard to atheists use in knowing how to > > > > > > > > > > live? > > > > > > > > > > What experience have they received from the external world > > > > > > > > > > that would > > > > > > > > > > tell them how to live? Are theists they only dupes on the > > > > > > > > > > block? > > > > > > > > > > > > What I have said in my last post may seem perhaps > > > > > > > > > > > exaggerated today, > > > > > > > > > > > and perhaps, I have gone forward too far and too fast in > > > > > > > > > > > saying what I > > > > > > > > > > > have said, so, it might seem to you a bit out of touch > > > > > > > > > > > with realities; > > > > > > > > > > > but this theory of mine is how it very well might happen > > > > > > > > > > > in the > > > > > > > > > > > future. > > > > > > > > > > > I don't know really what to think when this entire staff > > > > > > > > > > > comes from > > > > > > > > > > > you educated people of this world who have so much > > > > > > > > > > > knowledge and you > > > > > > > > > > > are able to express yourself so well as fast as lightning > > > > > > > > > > > and I salute > > > > > > > > > > > you for that. > > > > > > > > > > > > But may I say this; please don't continue to put too much > > > > > > > > > > > pressure on > > > > > > > > > > > the believers of God about their beliefs, and above all > > > > > > > > > > > about > > > > > > > > > > > providing proof of the existence of God, since this proof > > > > > > > > > > > is very hard > > > > > > > > > > > to find for anybody, and even harder for them because a > > > > > > > > > > > large number > > > > > > > > > > > of them are not as lucky and educated as you are. > > > > > > > > > > > I presume your being a bit sarcastic here, but still, I > > > > > > > > > > will respond > > > > > > > > > > as if not. I only point out that you are assuming that > > > > > > > > > > religion is > > > > > > > > > > teaching something to the dupes that would be good. Can > > > > > > > > > > you really > > > > > > > > > > speak in such generalities? Wouldn't we have to judge each > > > > > > > > > > religion > > > > > > > > > > on its own merits? > > > > > > > > > > > > So, may I suggest that you save some of your energy in > > > > > > > > > > > asking for > > > > > > > > > > > proof of the existence of God and search for the > > > > > > > > > > > existence of God by > > > > > > > > > > > yourself, as you are in a better position to understand > > > > > > > > > > > the complexity > > > > > > > > > > > of these things? > > > > > > > > > > > You may start with believing in God yourself, as this is > > > > > > > > > > > the only way > > > > > > > > > > > to find him. > > > > > > > > > > > You see it is like when you want to login or sign in for > > > > > > > > > > > the Internet > > > > > > > > > > > and you don't know the username and password therefore > > > > > > > > > > > you will never > > > > > > > > > > > be able to find what you want. So, in a parallel way you > > > > > > > > > > > will never be > > > > > > > > > > > able to find God and the proof of its existence unless > > > > > > > > > > > you believe in > > > > > > > > > > > God first. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > > > > > Manfraco. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 19, 1:16 am, archytas <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > One can have cake and not eat it Manfraco. I think we > > > > > > > > > > > > may have > > > > > > > > > > > > problems with proof rather than God/s. Most of us > > > > > > > > > > > > don't travel the > > > > > > > > > > > > universe much, but tend to believe the magicians who > > > > > > > > > > > > tell us their > > > > > > > > > > > > theories indicate a very big one, or several - perhaps > > > > > > > > > > > > because they > > > > > > > > > > > > give us trinkets like radios and televisions as > > > > > > > > > > > > colonists once traded > > > > > > > > > > > > beads and hair grips for women and gold. I deeply > > > > > > > > > > > > suspect "science" > > > > > > > > > > > > is part of the same kind of power relation as many > > > > > > > > > > > > understand it. > > > > > > > > > > > > These arguments are bedevilled with thoughts on one > > > > > > > > > > > > side that one > > > > > > > > > > > > cannot be moral without a religion and people like me > > > > > > > > > > > > who wonder how > > > > > > > > > > > > you can have a morality based on daft stories. We > > > > > > > > > > > > could all eat rice > > > > > > > > > > > > from the same bowl peacefully if we worked out the > > > > > > > > > > > > morality. > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 18 Jan, 05:31, manfraco FranktheElder > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Greetings to all those that follow Minds Eye group, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to have my say in this post and state > > > > > > > > > > > > > what I believe > > > > > > > > > > > > > about God; my point of view about this post is that > > > > > > > > > > > > > both sides stick > > > > > > > > > > > > > to their existing views, perhaps this is done just > > > > > > > > > > > > > for argument sake, > > > > > > > > > > > > > so that they keep arguing and enjoy themselves in > > > > > > > > > > > > > doing so. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But, have they ever thought that there might really > > > > > > > > > > > > > be a God? And if > > > > > > > > > > > > > there is a god what is this god like? Is this god > > > > > > > > > > > > > like the Abraham > > > > > > > > > > god > > > > > > > > > > > > > in the Bible? Or, could it be that there is a > > > > > > > > > > > > > different god > > > > > > > > > > > > > altogether? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have thought a lot about this matter and at the > > > > > > > > > > > > > moment I have come > > > > > > > > > > > > > to this conclusion; whish is that there is a god in > > > > > > > > > > > > > the universe and > > > > > > > > > > > > > one day I am going to write about my new found > > > > > > > > > > > > > beliefs about this > > > > > > > > > > god; > > > > > > > > > > > > > that is when my beliefs become more defined and it is > > > > > > > > > > > > > easier for me > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > write them down. > > > > > > > > > > > > > But now I want just to describe this god in the > > > > > > > > > > > > > shortest way > > > > > > > > > > > > > possible. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I believe that God is life and life is God itself > > > > > > > > > > > > > Therefore one can not exist without the other > > > > > > > > > > > > > And if there wasn't a God we would not exist or be > > > > > > > > > > > > > dead. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Greeting to you all > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Manfraco > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 18, 12:21 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We are beginning to cross threads here and I would > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rather discuss > > > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > within the intended thread. So we can move on with > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it I > > > > > > > > > > > > > > say........... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why don't you just watch and listen for the 20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > minutes? Perhaps it > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > like watching a bad movie but "Scanning" through > > > > > > > > > > > > > > only indicates > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Predisposition". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't have a problem with that, but simply > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stated, I would think > > > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > best that those who have no interest in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > participating should not > > > > > > > > > > > > > > participate and further not waste the time to state > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that they have > > > > > > > > > > no > > > > > > > > > > > > > > interest in participating. This of course is more > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the waste of > > > > > > > > > > time > > > > > > > > > > > > > > than actually watching the video. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can see now that it is in fact a very revealing > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thread in more > > > > > > > > > > ways > > > > > > > > > > > > > > than one. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jan 17, 7:35 pm, ornamentalmin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
