Sorry, I missed the word " not."

The line must read : In your other instances, the likely victims do
not have that.

On Feb 7, 11:21 am, Vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote:
> Does Bill have a voice in the decision, Pavan ?
>
> In your other instances, the likely victims do have that.
>
> On Feb 7, 9:25 am, Pavan Kolachoor <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > This is a famous philosophical question posted by
> > BBC.http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/7739493.stm
>
> > I never got an opportunity to discuss this with anybody, your thoughts
> > please.
>
> > *1. SHOULD WE KILL HEALTHY PEOPLE FOR THEIR ORGANS?*
>
> > Suppose Bill is a healthy man without family or loved ones. Would it be ok
> > painlessly to kill him if his organs would save five people, one of whom
> > needs a heart, another a kidney, and so on? If not, why not?
>
> > Consider another case: you and six others are kidnapped, and the kidnapper
> > somehow persuades you that if you shoot dead one of the other hostages, he
> > will set the remaining five free, whereas if you do not, he will shoot all
> > six. (Either way, he'll release you.)
>
> > If in this case you should kill one to save five, why not in the previous,
> > organs case? If in this case too you have qualms, consider yet another:
> > you're in the cab of a runaway tram and see five people tied to the track
> > ahead. You have the option of sending the tram on to the track forking off
> > to the left, on which only one person is tied. Surely you should send the
> > tram left, killing one to save five.
>
> > But then why not kill Bill?
>
> > --
> > Regards,
>
> > Pavan- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to