Too late, it's already been produced:
http://www.pflanzotheke.de/shop/exec/product/804/12773/Combi-Rosenspritzmittel.html

On 8 Mrz., 11:38, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
> Produce the vaccine Gabby - I tend to prefer truly scientific
> solutions.
>
> On 7 Mar, 18:52, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I wouldn’t want to live in your perfect rose garden, although it
> > smells nice in there. To me, vaccination seems the more liberating
> > form of protection against the dark of the night.
>
> > On 7 Mrz., 16:40, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Small is beautiful was the title of a book by EF (Fritz) Schumacher.
> > > It impressed me when I was impressionable and I was involved with the
> > > cooperative-commonwealth movement for a while - mostly trying to keep
> > > a few jobs afloat.  I then read his 'Guide for the Perplexed' - you
> > > could almost imagine an Errol Flynn style sword fight amongst us to
> > > get to it!  It was rubbish.
>
> > > There is much in the notion of doing things small though, especially
> > > now we could globalize on a fair basis.  Free markets and such have
> > > always been unreal in many senses - almost in the way that
> > > epistemology tends to boil down to conditions of existence.
> > > Something, frankly, has to protect them from banditry.  Ideology
> > > always seems to lapse to idiocy at the point we could be doing
> > > something - a bit like that point in science when there is a critical
> > > experiment that will bring research programmes together.  We could be
> > > trying all sorts of stuff in a spirit of protected competition.  The
> > > thinking doesn't have to be small and can range from anything from
> > > using satellite photographs to chose plant types, fertiliser amounts -
> > > on to the creation of small, metaphorically gated communities to help
> > > give us roots and handle policing and so on.  Much of my eventual
> > > reasoning on this involves insurance agreements amongst communities
> > > globally and cutting out the viler forms of bureaucratic waste (like
> > > overpaid bwankers and lawyers) - our aims would probably centre on
> > > resilience.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to