I do not know about the odds, Matthijs, but I do wish they'd do
that ...  Fidelity and Condoms walking hand in hand !

On Mar 23, 4:15 pm, Matthijs <[email protected]> wrote:
> How big are the odds to see the roman catholic path walk hand in hand
> with that of the ' scientific ' condoms??
>
> On 23 mrt, 08:07, Vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On the face of it, Pope's command barring use of condoms for Aids
> > prevention is unacceptable. There are multiple reasons why, the
> > primary of which is the well - known effect :  condoms are an
> > effective means to prevents Aids.
>
> > But, I recently discovered Pope's reasons for his commandment :  that,
> > the practice of condoms absolves individuals of their responsibility
> > towards their spouse, of Fidelity towards them. It's a moral most of
> > us live by, barring exceptional circumstances when we fail to uphold
> > the fidelity value.
>
> > The Abstinence part, as I understand, is fundamental to Roman Catholic
> > precepts. It, perhaps, calls upon individuals not to indulge in sex
> > for the pleasure of it, but only if one desires to procreate. That is,
> > if procreation is not purpose, then one should abstain.
>
> > I understand abstinence as a matter of practice laid down for
> > practitioners of Roman Catholic faith, for realisation of whatever it
> > is for which the Church was set up. People who disagree are free to
> > quit the faith. There is therefore little to be critical of the
> > practice, it being a part of the Roman Catholic path, unless one is
> > not free to quit the faith, in which case the forceful adherence would
> > be in contravention of Fundamental Rights guaranteed in all modern -
> > day democracies I know of.
>
> > It is the Fidelity vs Condoms stance that we might find interesting
> > enough to discuss. The Pope would have us see cheaply available
> > Condoms as both an inducing cause for licentious ( read,
> > irresponsible ) behaviour and as a an easy crutch on which we can rest
> > and carry on with our infidelities !
>
> > I see merit both ways : that of the Church and of Condoms. Clearly, I
> > stand confused. Rescuuuue meee ...  ! ! !- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to